Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalties under Notification No. 29/2004-Central Excise dated 9-7-2004.
Analysis: The demand arose from the Revenue's view that the units at Jolwa constituted one factory and that the concession under the notification was unavailable because the factory had facilities for manufacture of filament yarn. The Tribunal found that the appellants had a strong prima facie case, noting that the dispute turned on interpretation of the notification and that the issue was substantially supported by earlier Tribunal decisions dealing with separate registrations, interlinked units and entitlement to exemption. The facts were considered sufficiently similar to those precedents to justify interim relief pending appeal.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalties was waived and stay was granted during pendency of the appeals, in favour of the appellants.
Final Conclusion: Interim protection was granted to the appellants on the basis of a strong prima facie case, while the appeals remained pending for final hearing.