Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether "Kattal Gitti" of 90 mm size or less is covered by the entry relating to grit in Schedule II and taxable at 4%, or is to be treated as an unclassified item taxable at 12.5%.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the proper classification of stone broken into small pieces after blasting. The Tribunal had held that grit and "Kattal Gitti" were of the same class because the size was up to 90 mm, and therefore fell within the relevant entry attracting tax at 4%. The Court accepted that view, noting that the Supreme Court had already treated gitti, kankere and stone ballast as falling within the same classification for tax purposes. On the facts, pieces up to 90 mm were regarded as grit, while pieces exceeding that size would fall outside the entry and be treated as unclassified.
Conclusion: "Kattal Gitti" up to 90 mm was correctly held taxable at 4% under the grit entry, and not as an unclassified item at 12.5%; the Department's challenge failed.