Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a reference at the instance of the assessee under the Income-tax Act, the High Court can decline to answer the reference when the assessee fails to prepare and file the paper book required by the High Court Rules.
Analysis: The reference was made under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The relevant High Court Rules required the party at whose instance the reference was made to prepare the paper book, and the case could be heard only after the paper book had been prepared and supplied. Since the paper book was not filed despite notice, the reference was not ripe for hearing. The Court followed the rule-based procedure and the principle that, where the requisite paper book is not prepared by the assessee who sought the reference, the Court is not obliged to answer the reference. The Court also noted support from earlier authority that refusal to answer in such circumstances is permissible.
Conclusion: The Court could decline to answer the reference and return it unanswered.
Final Conclusion: The reference was not decided on merits and was sent back without an answer because the procedural requirement for hearing was not satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax reference is made at the instance of the assessee and the required paper book is not prepared, the High Court may refuse to answer the reference and return it unanswered.