Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellate Tribunal affirms Cenvat Credit for factory renovation; dismantling qualifies as input service</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Central Excise. Meerut-II Versus Jindal Pipes Ltd.</h3> Commissioner of Central Excise. Meerut-II Versus Jindal Pipes Ltd. - 2013 (30) S.T.R. 686 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:1. Appeal against Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing Cenvat Credit on dismantling of existing structure in the factory.Analysis:The Appellate Tribunal, after hearing both sides, examined the Commissioner's decision to allow the appeal regarding Cenvat Credit of Rs. 5,074 on dismantling of the existing structure in the factory. The Commissioner based the decision on the definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which includes services related to renovation or repairs of a factory. The Commissioner referred to various definitions of 'renovate' from legal sources, concluding that dismantling the existing structure for renovation falls under the definition of input service. The Tribunal noted that renovation typically involves dismantling the existing structure to build a new one, supporting the Commissioner's decision. Therefore, the Tribunal found no issue with the Commissioner's order and rejected the Revenue's appeal.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing Cenvat Credit on the dismantling of the existing structure in the factory, as it falls under the definition of 'renovation' within the scope of 'input service' as per the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that renovation commonly includes dismantling to facilitate the construction of a new structure, affirming the Commissioner's decision and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.