Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (2) TMI 478 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal allowed for statistical purposes, applying 7.85% net profit rate. Sales estimation based on incriminating docs upheld. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the application of a net profit rate of 7.85% for computing undisclosed income ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeal allowed for statistical purposes, applying 7.85% net profit rate. Sales estimation based on incriminating docs upheld.

                            The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the application of a net profit rate of 7.85% for computing undisclosed income within the block period. The Tribunal upheld the estimation of sales based on incriminating documents and rejected the GP rate of 23%, opting for the net profit rate instead. The disallowance of expenses of Profit & Loss Account nature was also overturned, emphasizing the consideration of expenses in the net profit rate. The decision was specific to the case at hand and not meant as a general precedent.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Opportunity denied to the assessee regarding the computation of final undisclosed income.
                            2. Estimate of sales for each assessment year within the block period.
                            3. Estimate of Gross Profit (GP) rate at 23%.
                            4. Disallowance of expenses of Profit & Loss Account nature.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Opportunity Denied to the Assessee:
                            - Ground No. 1(a): The assessee raised an objection that the Assessing Officer (AO) denied them the opportunity to contest the computation of final undisclosed income. However, this ground was not pressed by the assessee's representative and was dismissed as not pressed.

                            2. Estimate of Sales for Each Assessment Year within the Block Period:
                            - Ground No. 1(b): The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the estimate of sales for each assessment year within the block period without appreciating the assessee's submissions supported by seized documents and relevant case laws.
                            - Findings: The AO conducted a search and seizure operation, which revealed unaccounted sales of bricks. The AO determined that the regular books of account were unreliable and invoked Section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO estimated the sales based on seized documents and determined an undisclosed income of Rs. 70,13,557/-. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's findings, stating that the provisions of Section 158BC(b) allow the AO to make estimates based on seized documents.
                            - Conclusion: The Tribunal found that the AO was competent to make estimates based on incriminating documents and upheld the estimation of sales for the block period.

                            3. Estimate of Gross Profit (GP) Rate at 23%:
                            - Ground No. 1(c): The assessee challenged the GP rate of 23% used by the AO, arguing that it ignored their submissions and comparable cases.
                            - Findings: The AO adopted a GP rate of 23% for computing undisclosed income, arguing that expenses were already covered under the 'Expenses Head' of 77%. The assessee argued for the application of net profit (NP) instead of GP, citing various case laws.
                            - Conclusion: The Tribunal, after considering the case laws and the specific facts of the case, deemed it fair to apply a net profit rate of 7.85% for determining the undisclosed income for the block period, rather than the GP rate of 23%.

                            4. Disallowance of Expenses of Profit & Loss Account Nature:
                            - Ground No. 1(d): The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of expenses that are normally incurred and some of which were payments to government and semi-government organizations.
                            - Findings: The AO disallowed these expenses, arguing that they were already covered under the 77% expenses head. The Tribunal found that the AO's approach was not justified, especially in light of the case laws cited by the assessee.
                            - Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the AO to apply a net profit rate of 7.85% for the purpose of computing undisclosed income, which inherently considers the expenses.

                            General Ground:
                            - Ground No. 2: This ground was general in nature and did not require separate adjudication.

                            Final Judgment:
                            - The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the direction to apply a net profit rate of 7.85% for the computation of undisclosed income for the block period. The decision was based on the special facts of the present case and was not intended to serve as a general precedent.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found