Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be interfered with on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice for alleged non-grant of personal hearing.
Analysis: The assessment proceedings were initiated by notice under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The record in the assessment order recorded that the dealer was given an opportunity of personal hearing, that the authorised representative appeared, and that the reply was heard. There was no specific averment that these statements were incorrect. In these circumstances, the factual basis for alleging denial of hearing was not established, and the plea of breach of natural justice failed.
Conclusion: The challenge based on violation of natural justice was rejected and interference with the assessment order was declined.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition did not succeed, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory remedies available against the assessment order.
Ratio Decidendi: A challenge to an assessment order on the ground of denial of natural justice cannot succeed where the order records that a personal hearing was afforded and the contrary factual assertion is not specifically disputed.