Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (2) TMI 231 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Fair Market Value Determines Leasehold Land Acquisition Cost for Capital Gains Calculation The Tribunal held that the cost of acquisition of leasehold land should be based on the fair market value as of 1.4.1981, valuing the leasehold rights at ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Fair Market Value Determines Leasehold Land Acquisition Cost for Capital Gains Calculation

                            The Tribunal held that the cost of acquisition of leasehold land should be based on the fair market value as of 1.4.1981, valuing the leasehold rights at Rs. 800 per square yard. The AO was directed to calculate long-term capital gain using this valuation, allowing the indexed cost of acquisition. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, emphasizing the importance of determining fair market value for leasehold rights in land.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Cost of acquisition of leasehold land.
                            2. Applicability of Section 55(2)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
                            3. Determination of fair market value as on 1.4.1981 for leasehold rights.
                            4. Principles of natural justice.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Cost of Acquisition of Leasehold Land:

                            The primary issue in this appeal was the cost of acquisition of leasehold land at Ashram Road, Ahmedabad, claimed by the assessee at Rs. 2.99 crores but taken at NIL by the Department. The assessee argued that the cost of acquisition should include the Rs. 4 lakhs spent on constructing a Cinema Hall as per the lease agreement dated 15.9.1966. The Department, however, considered the cost of acquisition as NIL under Section 55(2)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

                            2. Applicability of Section 55(2)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act:

                            The Revenue authorities based their decision on the fact that the assessee did not pay any "cash" at the time of the lease deed execution and only committed to invest in the construction of a Cinema Hall. The Tribunal held that the provision of Section 55(2)(a)(ii) applies to specific capital assets such as goodwill, trademarks, and tenancy rights, and not to leasehold rights in land. Therefore, the cost of acquisition of the leasehold land should be determined based on the fair market value as on 1.4.1981, rather than being taken at NIL.

                            3. Determination of Fair Market Value as on 1.4.1981 for Leasehold Rights:

                            The Tribunal emphasized that for assets held before 1.4.1981, the fair market value as on 1.4.1981 should be considered for determining the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal noted that the approved valuer's report estimated the land value at Rs. 1,200 per square yard as on 1.4.1981 but did not account for the fact that the assessee held leasehold rights and not freehold rights. After considering the leasehold nature of the rights and the commercial location of the land, the Tribunal decided that Rs. 800 per square yard would be a fair valuation for the leasehold rights as on 1.4.1981. The AO was directed to determine the long-term capital gain based on this valuation and allow the indexed cost of acquisition.

                            4. Principles of Natural Justice:

                            Although the assessee initially raised issues related to the violation of principles of natural justice, such as not being given an opportunity to prove the cost of acquisition during assessment proceedings, these issues were not contested further during the hearing. The Tribunal focused on the main issue of determining the cost of acquisition and fair market value.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal concluded that the value of the leasehold rights in the land should be determined based on the fair market value as on 1.4.1981, at Rs. 800 per square yard, and directed the AO to compute the long-term capital gain accordingly. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found