1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court grants interim stay and injunction against recovery notice pending tribunal appeal</h1> The court granted an interim stay and injunction in response to the challenge against Circular No. 967/01/2013-CX and the subsequent recovery notice. The ... Notice for recovery - Challenge the Circular No. 967/01/2013-CX dated 1.1.2013 - Held that:- An appeal has been filed before the CESTAT along with the stay application, but no hearing has been granted so far & in the meanwhile, recovery notice has been issued on 9.1.2013. An assessee who moves an application for waiver and is diligent in pursuing the application cannot be blamed for the inability of the appellate forum to dispose of the stay application In view of the above, post the matter on 31.01.2013. There will be an order of interim stay and interim injunction till then. The petitioner is permitted to take steps to implead the CESTAT before which the appeal is pending, as a party respondent, in the meantime. Issues: Challenge to Circular No. 967/01/2013-CX and consequential recovery noticeIn this judgment, the petitioner challenged Circular No. 967/01/2013-CX dated 1.1.2013 and the recovery notice issued on 9.1.2013. The petitioner had filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal along with a stay application. However, despite the pending appeal and stay application, a recovery notice was issued, mandating the recovery of the amount within 30 days of filing the appeal. The petitioner argued that the proviso to Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act does not specify any time limit, and therefore, the circular exceeded its provisions.The court, after hearing arguments from both sides, ordered an interim stay and interim injunction until the matter was further heard on 31.01.2013. The petitioner was also allowed to implead the CESTAT as a party respondent in the case pending before the tribunal. This decision was made to ensure that the petitioner's rights were protected during the ongoing legal proceedings and to prevent any immediate recovery actions based on the challenged circular and recovery notice.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
