1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal denies Revenue's stay application on refund claim under CENVAT Credit Rules.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue's stay application regarding a refund claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, ... Refund claim - Whether assessee is entitled for refund for the period prior to the date registration under service tax - Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Filed refund claim of the services exported by them prior to 13.12.2008 - Registration took on 13.12.2008 - Held that:-Following the decision in case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions (P.) Ltd.(2011 (9) TMI 450 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT) and M/s. Varizon Data Services (I) (P) Ltd. (2012 (6) TMI 143 - CESTAT, CHENNAI) that assessees are entitled for refund claim. In favour of assessee The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai dismissed the Revenue's stay application regarding a refund claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal cited a precedent decision and a High Court ruling to support the dismissal of the appeal filed by the Revenue.