Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit was admissible on Solvent 1425 when the supplier classified it under a heading excluded from the eligible list, and whether the user could alter that classification for credit purposes.
Analysis: The relevant period was January to October 1997, when goods falling under Chapter sub-heading 2710.11 were excluded from MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. The controlling principle applied was that classification adopted by the manufacturer-supplier cannot be changed in the hands of the user-manufacturer. Since Solvent 1425 was classified under 2710.11 by the supplier, the appellant could not reclassify it as 2710.14 to claim credit. The decision cited by the appellant was held inapplicable because the credit regime under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002/2004 differed from the regime applicable during the dispute period.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit was not admissible on Solvent 1425, and the disallowance of credit was sustained against the appellant.