Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale deed was a conditional sale deed carrying a right of reconveyance, and whether the additions and interlineations in the deed made after execution could bind the respondent and sustain a decree for specific performance.
Analysis: The registered sale deed was admitted, but the Court found that the words added in the margin and the reconveyance clause were inserted after execution and were not attested by the executant. The mandatory requirement regarding interlineations and alterations under the Registration Act and the Karnataka Registration Rules was not complied with. On the evidence, the later additions were held to be suspicious and inconsistent with a genuine conditional sale. The Court further held that interference with findings of fact in second appeal is permissible only where the findings are perverse, but on the record the High Court had correctly restored the trial court's view that the deed, as executed, did not contain a binding reconveyance covenant.
Conclusion: The alleged right of reconveyance was not proved, the altered clauses were not binding on the respondent, and the suit for specific performance was rightly rejected.