Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit on outward freight and godown rent on the footing that the sales were FOR destination sales and the customer's premises constituted the place of removal.
Analysis: The relevant test for FOR destination sale, as applied from the Board circular, is whether ownership during transit remains with the supplier, the risk of loss or damage during transit is borne by the supplier, and freight up to the customer's premises forms an integral part of the price. The invoices described the sales as FOR destination basis and duty had been paid on the price including freight. The absence of insurance charges by itself did not establish that the supplier had not borne transit risk. On these facts, the customer's premises had to be treated as the place of removal. Once that was so, outward freight up to that point qualified for credit, and the godown rent was also eligible because the service was used before removal of the goods and for storage of inputs.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit on both outward freight and godown rent.