Tribunal rules 'wet starch' duty exemption for Sago manufacturers. No penalties without intent.

The Tribunal held that duty on 'wet starch' used in the manufacturing of exempted 'Sago' is not applicable. The appellants, M/s. Venkatachalapathi Rice and Sago Factory, were not liable to pay duty on 'wet starch'. Regarding penalties under Section 11AC for delayed duty payment, as there was no evidence of fraud or intent to evade duty, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, M/s. Venkatachalapathi Rice & Sago Factory and M/s. Dhanalakshmi Sago Factory, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

---

---

Issues:
1. Liability of duty on 'wet starch' captively consumed in the manufacture of exempted final product 'Sago'.
2. Imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis:
1. The appellants, M/s. Venkatachalapathi Rice and Sago Factory, contested against the demand of duty on 'wet starch' emerging during the production of 'Sago', an exempted final product. The Tribunal referred to a previous case and a subsequent apex court decision, concluding that duty on 'wet starch' captively consumed in the manufacturing of 'Sago' exempted from duty is not applicable. Hence, the appellants are not liable to pay duty on 'wet starch'.

2. In the case of penalties imposed under Section 11AC on M/s. Venkatachalapathi Rice & Sago Factory and M/s. Dhanalakshmi Sago Factory for delayed duty payment, the Tribunal found that the appellants were actively seeking exemption for the product from duty. As there was no evidence of fraud, collusion, willful misstatement, or intent to evade duty, the Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 11AC was not justified. Consequently, the appellants' appeals were allowed, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.

---