Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the block assessment in the assessee's case was correctly assessed under Section 158BC rather than Section 158BD, and whether the assessment was time-barred under the applicable limitation provision.
Analysis: The search was conducted in the assessee's premises on the same date as the search in another person's case, and incriminating materials were seized in that search. On those facts, the case fell within Section 158BC, while Section 158BD applied only where undisclosed income of a person other than the searched person was brought to assessment on the basis of material found in the search of that other person. The limitation for a case falling under Section 158BC was governed by Section 158BE(1)(a), and the subsequent file noting could not alter the statutory character of the proceedings or extend the limitation period. Since the assessment was completed after the prescribed period had expired, it was barred by limitation.
Conclusion: The assessment was governed by Section 158BC, not Section 158BD, and it was time-barred.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee itself is searched and incriminating material is found in that search, the block assessment must proceed under Section 158BC, and limitation is computed under Section 158BE(1)(a) from the end of the month in which the search authorisation was executed.