Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pending prosecution against the petitioners was liable to be quashed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground that the complaint did not disclose sufficient allegations to justify issuance of process.
Analysis: The complaint alleged that the petitioners, as partners of the first accused firm, conspired with the other accused to wilfully evade tax, defraud the revenue, deceive the Income-tax Officer, and fabricate false evidence by maintaining books of account containing false entries. On those averments, the allegations were held to disclose a prima facie case sufficient to permit the prosecution to proceed. The Court further held that the prosecution must be allowed to adduce evidence, and the petitioners could raise their contentions before the trial Magistrate after the evidence was recorded.
Conclusion: The petitioners were not entitled to quashing of the prosecution at this stage.
Final Conclusion: The complaint disclosed sufficient material to proceed to trial, and the inherent jurisdiction of the Court was not invoked to terminate the prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi: Quashing under the inherent criminal jurisdiction is not warranted where the complaint, taken at face value, contains averments making out a prima facie case for trial.