Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay in respect of Cenvat credit denied on Custom House Agents service, telephone service, insurance service, and repairs and maintenance services.
Analysis: Credit on Custom House Agents service was considered admissible because it related to export of goods and was covered by prior Tribunal and High Court decisions relied upon by the appellant. Telephone charges and insurance relating to plant and machinery and employees were also treated as covered by the legal position applied in those decisions. However, insurance of goods in transit was held to fall outside the definition of input service, since it related to goods after removal from the factory and not to the manufacturing process.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted partial relief by being directed to pre-deposit only Rs. 15,000, with stay of recovery of the balance amount on compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: Services integrally connected with export activity, business operations, or the manufacturing establishment may qualify as input services, but services relating to goods after removal from the factory are outside the ambit of input service.