Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in directing pre-deposit of Rs. 3 crores as a condition for hearing the appeal on merits.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the applicability of service tax to maintenance and repair of roads and airport runways, in the context of the statutory exemption for roads and the appellant's contention that runways are also covered within that expression. The Court found that the appellant had a strong prima facie and arguable case, and that the Tribunal had not given adequate consideration to the question whether runways fall within the genus of roads before insisting on a substantial pre-deposit. In these circumstances, the Tribunal's order directing deposit of Rs. 3 crores was not sustained.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit direction was set aside and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits without insisting on any pre-deposit of duty, interest or penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee raises a substantial prima facie challenge on the taxability of the demand and the Tribunal fails to properly consider that issue, insistence on a heavy pre-deposit is unwarranted.