TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal excludes deferred consideration from capital gains calculation</h1> <h3>Shri Raju Shete, Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-3,</h3> Shri Raju Shete, Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-3, - TMI Issues:- Interpretation of agreement for sale of shares- Computation of capital gains- Validity of assessment orders passed by AO u/s 143(3)- Revision of assessments u/s 263Interpretation of agreement for sale of shares:The case involved the interpretation of an agreement for the sale of shares where the initial consideration was fixed at Rs.2.70 crores, with deferred consideration to be paid based on the financial position of the company in subsequent years. The agreement capped the total consideration at Rs.20 crores. The dispute arose when the CIT held that the total consideration for the sale of shares was fixed at Rs.20 crores, leading to a revision of assessments u/s 263. The assessees argued that the deferred consideration was uncertain and contingent on future financial performance, hence only the initial consideration should be considered for computing capital gains. The Tribunal agreed with the assessees, emphasizing that the deferred consideration was not certain and could not be quantified accurately, therefore only the initial consideration should be included in the computation of capital gains.Computation of capital gains:The assessees had declared long-term capital gains from the sale of shares based on the initial consideration received. However, the CIT contended that the total consideration for the sale was Rs.20 crores as per the agreement, leading to a revision under section 263. The Tribunal analyzed the agreement terms and concluded that since the deferred consideration was uncertain and contingent on future financial performance, only the initial consideration of Rs.2.70 crores should be considered for computing capital gains. The Tribunal upheld the assessees' computation of capital gains based on the initial consideration alone, as the deferred consideration was not certain and could not be accurately quantified.Validity of assessment orders passed by AO u/s 143(3):The AO had accepted the assessees' declaration of capital gains based on the initial consideration in the assessments completed u/s 143(3). However, the CIT found these assessments erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interest, leading to a revision under section 263. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT, stating that the AO's acceptance of the capital gains declaration based on the initial consideration was correct. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessments were not erroneous as alleged by the CIT, as the initial consideration was the only certain amount payable for the sale of shares.Revision of assessments u/s 263:The CIT revised the assessments u/s 263, directing the AO to compute capital gains by considering the total sale consideration at Rs.20 crores. The assessees challenged this revision before the Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the CIT's orders under section 263, reinstating the assessment orders made by the AO u/s 143(3). The Tribunal concluded that the CIT's revision was based on an erroneous interpretation of the agreement terms, as the deferred consideration was uncertain and contingent on future financial performance, hence only the initial consideration should be considered for computing capital gains.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
