Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (12) TMI 416 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules on interest income, depreciation, entertainment costs, and bad debt deduction The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals by setting aside the disallowance of interest income on securities for the broken period, disallowing ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal rules on interest income, depreciation, entertainment costs, and bad debt deduction

                            The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals by setting aside the disallowance of interest income on securities for the broken period, disallowing depreciation on leased assets, allowing entertainment expenses, permitting the loss on unmatured foreign exchange contracts, and directing the computation of bad debt deduction in line with earlier decisions. The Tribunal's decision was based on a detailed analysis and reliance on precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Assessment of interest on securities
                            2. Allowability of depreciation on leased assets
                            3. Disallowance of entertainment expenses
                            4. Disallowance of loss on unmatured foreign exchange contracts
                            5. Reduction of claim of bad debt under section 36(1)(vii)

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Assessment of Interest on Securities:
                            The dispute centered on whether interest income from securities, which became due after the end of the previous year, should be assessed for the broken period till 31st March. The assessee argued that interest accrued only on due dates and thus should not be assessed for the broken period. The revenue contended that interest accrued on a day-to-day basis under the mercantile system of accounting. The Tribunal, referring to the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Director (International Taxation) vs. Credit Swisse First Boston (Cyprus) Ltd., held that interest income for the broken period had not accrued to the assessee, as the right to receive interest was vested only on the due dates. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order of CIT(A) and deleted the additions made for both assessment years.

                            2. Allowability of Depreciation on Leased Assets:
                            The assessee claimed depreciation on a boiler leased to Indo Gulf Fertilizer & Chemical Corporation. The AO disallowed the claim, interpreting the transaction as a financial transaction rather than a genuine lease. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. The Tribunal referred to a Special Bench decision which held that the transaction was merely an advance of loan and not a genuine lease, thereby confirming the disallowance of depreciation in both years.

                            3. Disallowance of Entertainment Expenses:
                            For the assessment year 1998-99, the AO disallowed entertainment expenses on the grounds that they were not wholly and exclusively for business purposes. CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to 25%. The Tribunal found that the expenses were incurred in connection with clients and business visitors, and since the specific provision for disallowance of entertainment expenses under section 37(2) had been deleted, the expenses were allowable. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and allowed the claim of the assessee.

                            4. Disallowance of Loss on Unmatured Foreign Exchange Contracts:
                            For the assessment year 1999-2000, the assessee claimed a loss on revaluation of unmatured foreign exchange contracts. The AO disallowed the claim, considering it notional. CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. The Tribunal, following its own decision in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2000-01 and the Special Bench decision in the case of Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait, allowed the claim, stating that the loss was computed as per the method of accounting and FEDAI guidelines.

                            5. Reduction of Claim of Bad Debt under Section 36(1)(vii):
                            The AO reduced the claim of bad debt by deducting the opening and closing provisions. CIT(A) confirmed this approach. The Tribunal referred to its decision in the assessee's case for the assessment year 2000-01 and the case of Oman International Bank, SAOG vs. DCIT, which clarified the computation of bad debt deduction. The Tribunal directed the AO to compute the deduction in line with the earlier decisions, allowing the claim of the assessee.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal's comprehensive analysis and reliance on precedents led to a mixed outcome, with some claims being allowed and others disallowed, thereby partly allowing both appeals.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found