Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>ITAT decision on stock valuation, discount claim, and tax appeal limits</h1> <h3>Ratnaraj Sarees Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Kheda Circle, Nadiad.</h3> Ratnaraj Sarees Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Kheda Circle, Nadiad. - TMI Issues:1. Rejection of claim for 50% discount in stock valuation.2. Rejection of claim for stock not credited in books.3. Rejection of claim for value of closing stock and deduction of discount.4. Revenue's appeal on additions made and applicability of section 145(3).Analysis:Issue 1: Rejection of claim for 50% discount in stock valuationThe assessee claimed a 50% discount in the valuation of obsolete stock, which was not accepted by the department. The ITAT held that the method of valuation of stock should be lower of cost or market value uniformly. The assessee had already deducted the gross profit from the sale price of the stock, indicating the cost price was considered. Therefore, the claim for further deduction for discount sale was not allowed, as it would result in valuing part of the stock at market price and part at cost price, which is impermissible.Issue 2: Rejection of claim for stock not credited in booksThe assessee presented bills for Rs.2,42,501 during a survey, which were not credited in the books. The department disallowed the claim due to an alleged inordinate delay in making the claim. However, the ITAT found that there was no verification of the genuineness of the bills by the Assessing Officer (AO). The addition made solely on suspicion without evidence to doubt the genuineness of the claim was deemed unsustainable, and the claim was allowed.Issue 3: Rejection of claim for value of closing stock and deduction of discountThe grounds related to the value of closing stock and deduction of discount were not pressed by the assessee and were dismissed accordingly.Issue 4: Revenue's appeal on additions made and applicability of section 145(3)The Revenue's appeal contested various additions made, but the ITAT found that the appeal was not maintainable due to the disputed tax effect being less than Rs.2 lakhs. Citing CBDT circulars, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal on the grounds of restricted filing of appeals before the Appellate Tribunal based on monetary limits specified in the circulars.In conclusion, the assessee's appeal was partly allowed, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed due to the appeal not meeting the monetary limits set by CBDT circulars.