Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on tax issues for A.Ys. 2004-05 and 2005-06</h1> <h3>ACIT, Anand Versus National Dairy Development Board</h3> ACIT, Anand Versus National Dairy Development Board - TMI Issues Involved:1. Computation of depreciation on assets acquired more than 10 years back.2. Addition of interest income following a change in the method of accounting.3. Taxability of interest earned on project funds.4. Deductibility of grants given to cooperative societies.5. Disallowance of contributions to Employees' Recreation Trust under section 40A(9).6. Deduction under section 36(1)(viii) for producing milk and milk products.7. Computation of depreciation in view of retrospective amendment to section 43(6).Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Computation of Depreciation on Assets Acquired More Than 10 Years Back:The Revenue challenged the computation of depreciation on the written down value (WDV) for A.Y. 2003-04, arguing that notional depreciation should be considered for assets acquired over 10 years ago. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision for A.Y. 2003-04, which was upheld by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court and the Supreme Court, stating that depreciation should be computed on the original cost of the assets as no depreciation was actually allowed in the past. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's ground, holding that the WDV means the actual cost to the assessee less depreciation actually allowed.2. Addition of Interest Income Following a Change in the Method of Accounting:The AO added interest income of Rs.32,11,90,382/- for A.Y. 2004-05 and Rs.8,35,26,671/- for A.Y. 2005-06, arguing that the assessee switched from cash to mercantile system retrospectively to escape tax. The Tribunal, following its decision for A.Y. 2003-04 and the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court's ruling, held that the change in the method of accounting was bona fide and in line with accounting standards. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's ground, stating that the interest income accrued in earlier years when the assessee was non-taxable could not be taxed in the year of receipt.3. Taxability of Interest Earned on Project Funds:The assessee argued that interest earned on project funds amounting to Rs.1,22,05,405/- (A.Y. 2004-05) and Rs.1,16,92,827/- (A.Y. 2005-06) should not be taxed as it acted as a nodal agency. The Tribunal, consistent with its earlier decision, held that the interest had accrued to the assessee and dismissed the assessee's grounds.4. Deductibility of Grants Given to Cooperative Societies:The assessee claimed deduction for grants given to cooperative societies under section 36(1)(xii). The Tribunal, following its decision for A.Y. 2003-04 and the case of Oil Industry Development Board, restored the matter to the AO for verification of non-refundable grants. The Tribunal allowed the grounds for statistical purposes.5. Disallowance of Contributions to Employees' Recreation Trust under Section 40A(9):The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs.2,39,924/- (A.Y. 2004-05) and Rs.4,75,394/- (A.Y. 2005-06) for contributions to Employees' Recreation Trust, consistent with its decision for A.Y. 2003-04, stating that section 40A(9) disallows such contributions unless they fall under sections 36(1)(iv) and (v). The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's grounds.6. Deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) for Producing Milk and Milk Products:The Tribunal, consistent with its decisions for A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. 2006-07, held that the assessee did not comply with the conditions prescribed under section 36(1)(viii) and dismissed the assessee's ground for A.Y. 2005-06.7. Computation of Depreciation in View of Retrospective Amendment to Section 43(6):The Tribunal allowed the assessee's ground for A.Y. 2005-06, holding that notional depreciation could not be considered, and directed the AO to recompute the WDV correctly. The Tribunal allowed the additional ground for A.Y. 2005-06, ensuring the correct WDV computation.Conclusion:For A.Ys. 2004-05 and 2005-06, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and partly allowed the assessee's appeals for statistical purposes, restoring certain matters to the AO for reconsideration.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found