Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT directs reevaluation of disallowance under Section 14A, emphasizes verification of expenses</h1> <h3>Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax., Circle 13(1), Versus Nucleus Software Exports Ltd.,</h3> Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax., Circle 13(1), Versus Nucleus Software Exports Ltd., - TMI Issues Involved:1. Reduction of disallowance under Section 14A.2. Applicability of Rule 8D and relevant judicial precedents.3. Determination of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Reduction of Disallowance under Section 14A:The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision to reduce the disallowance under Section 14A to Rs. 9,91,465, which was 10% of the dividend income. The CIT(A) justified this reduction by stating that no income, whether taxable or exempt, can be earned without incurring some expenses. The CIT(A) noted that the assessee had significant investments and must have incurred overhead and administrative expenses. However, the CIT(A) did not apply Rule 8D retrospectively, as per the Bombay High Court's ruling in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs. DCIT. The CIT(A) estimated the expenses at 10% of the dividend received, granting the assessee relief of Rs. 26,53,747.2. Applicability of Rule 8D and Relevant Judicial Precedents:The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) ignored the Bombay High Court's judgment in Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs. DCIT, which upheld the disallowance made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. However, the ITAT noted that Rule 8D, inserted with effect from 24.3.2008, was not applicable retrospectively. The ITAT referred to several judicial precedents, including the Supreme Court's decisions in CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. and the Bombay High Court's ruling in Godrej & Boyce, which clarified that Rule 8D applies only from AY 2008-09 onwards. For prior years, the AO must determine the disallowable expenditure by a reasonable method.3. Determination of Expenditure Incurred in Relation to Exempt Income:The ITAT emphasized that even where the assessee claims no expenditure was incurred for earning exempt income, the AO must verify the correctness of such claims. The AO is required to record satisfaction regarding the correctness of the assessee's claim. The ITAT referred to the jurisdictional High Court's decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd., which mandates that the AO must determine the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income based on a reasonable and acceptable method. The ITAT observed that neither the AO nor the CIT(A) had sufficient details or accounts to ascertain the expenditure incurred by the assessee for managing and supervising the investments.Conclusion:The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the AO for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to decide the issue afresh, in accordance with law and judicial pronouncements, after allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to furnish relevant details of expenditure incurred in managing and supervising the investments. The AO was instructed to pass a speaking order, providing reasons for satisfaction or otherwise, regarding the disallowance under Section 14A.Additional Grounds:No additional grounds were raised, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found