Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit of duty paid by the job worker on inputs cleared for processing under Rule 4(5)(a) and received back after processing.
Analysis: The goods were sent to the job worker under the prescribed challan and duty was discharged by the job worker before the processed inputs were returned to the appellant. The issue stood covered by binding precedent holding that once duty has been paid by the job worker on such goods, there is no basis to deny Cenvat credit to the manufacturer receiving the goods back.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to avail the Cenvat credit, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.