TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal allows CENVAT Credit for grey fabrics as inputs under Notification</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-I Versus KRISHNA TERINE PVT. LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-I Versus KRISHNA TERINE PVT. LTD. - 2012 (279) E.L.T. 420 (Tri. - Ahmd.) Issues:Determining eligibility for CENVAT Credit under Notification No. 35/2003-C.E. (N.T.) on grey fabrics as input or finished goods.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad involved the question of whether the respondent-assessee could claim CENVAT Credit under Notification No. 35/2003-C.E. (N.T.) on the stock of grey fabrics, categorizing them as either input or finished goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the grey fabrics in stock should be considered as inputs, making the assessee eligible for a higher credit rate. The Commissioner emphasized that the terms 'input lying in stock' and 'finished goods lying in stock' were not defined in the notification and should be interpreted based on common understanding. It was noted that the notification did not differentiate between a dealer and a manufacturer for the purpose of credit, thus entitling the dealer to credit as well. The Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner's interpretation, particularly as the appellant was a merchant-manufacturer who processed the grey fabrics before selling them, aligning with the duty levy scheme at that time.The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's observations and rejected the Revenue's appeal, concluding that the appellant, being a merchant-manufacturer involved in processing grey fabrics, was entitled to treat the fabrics as inputs for the purpose of claiming CENVAT Credit. The decision highlighted the importance of interpreting terms in notifications based on common understanding and the absence of discriminatory provisions between dealers and manufacturers in such cases. The judgment emphasized the relevance of the appellant's role as a merchant-manufacturer in determining the eligibility for credit under the notification, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
