Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (11) TMI 550 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal dismisses revenue's appeal, upholds CIT(A)'s decision. Addition of income confirmed, remand for further review. The revenue's appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 14.40 Lacs due to new evidence provided by ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal dismisses revenue's appeal, upholds CIT(A)'s decision. Addition of income confirmed, remand for further review.

                          The revenue's appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 14.40 Lacs due to new evidence provided by the assessee. The addition of Rs. 9 Lacs from M/s Global Med. Surg. (P) Ltd. and M/s Phythochem Healthcare Pharmaceuticals was remanded back to the CIT(A) for further review. The confirmation of the addition of Rs. 30 Lacs as additional income u/s 69B was upheld by the Tribunal, dismissing the assessee's appeal on this ground.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 14.40 Lacs by CIT(A) on account of unexplained accretion in the capital account.
                          2. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 9 Lacs by CIT(A) on account of credits from M/s Global Med. Surg. (P) Ltd. and M/s Phythochem Healthcare Pharmaceuticals.
                          3. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 30 Lacs by CIT(A) on account of additional income u/s 69B.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 14.40 Lacs by CIT(A) on Account of Unexplained Accretion in the Capital Account
                          The revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 14.40 Lacs made by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to unexplained accretion in the capital account. The AO had invoked Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the absence of evidence during the assessment proceedings. However, the CIT(A) deleted the addition after considering new evidence provided by the assessee during the appellate proceedings.

                          The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had sought comments from the AO on the new evidence and subsequently provided these comments to the assessee. The CIT(A) examined the relevant copies of accounts and bank statements, verifying the movement of funds. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, stating that the requisite evidence was provided, and there was no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order. Therefore, the revenue's appeal on this ground was dismissed.

                          2. Confirmation of Addition of Rs. 9 Lacs by CIT(A) on Account of Credits from M/s Global Med. Surg. (P) Ltd. and M/s Phythochem Healthcare Pharmaceuticals
                          The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 9 Lacs, comprising Rs. 5 Lacs from M/s Global Med. Surg. (P) Ltd. and Rs. 4 Lacs from M/s Phythochem Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. The AO had initially made an addition of Rs. 16 Lacs for unexplained unsecured loans but accepted Rs. 5 Lacs from Shri Subhash Chander Garg as explained.

                          The CIT(A) granted relief for Rs. 2 Lacs from Law Medbros Pvt. Ltd. and Rs. 5 Lacs from Smt. Charanjeet Kaur, but upheld the addition of Rs. 9 Lacs due to insufficient evidence regarding the identity, capacity, and genuineness of the creditors. The Tribunal admitted new evidence under Rule 46A and remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, instructing the CIT(A) to consider the new evidence and provide a proper and reasonable opportunity to both parties.

                          3. Confirmation of Addition of Rs. 30 Lacs by CIT(A) on Account of Additional Income u/s 69B
                          The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 30 Lacs as additional income u/s 69B without corroborative evidence. The addition was based on a survey conducted at M/s Oscar Remedies Pvt. Ltd., where the assessee, as a Director, declared additional income of Rs. 30 Lacs for unexplained investment in the construction of a factory building.

                          The Tribunal noted that the assessee had voluntarily declared the additional income during the survey and did not retract the declaration. The CIT(A) distinguished the case laws cited by the assessee and upheld the addition, stating that the declaration was voluntary and not under coercion. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the findings, dismissing the assessee's appeal on this ground.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, with the case regarding the addition of Rs. 9 Lacs remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found