Incorrect statutory interpretation led to remand, leaving bonus deduction under income tax law open for fresh consideration.

The Tribunal's deduction allowance for bonus paid above the statutory ceiling could not stand because it proceeded on a mistaken view of section 31A of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, treating the second proviso as if it came into force only on 03.09.1977 when it had merely been rearranged by amendment. As the decision rested on an incorrect legal basis, the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on all open contentions. The Court did not finally determine the interaction between section 36(1)(ii) and section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or the substantive allowability of the claim.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Tribunal erred in allowing deduction of bonus paid in excess of the statutory ceiling by proceeding on an appreciation of section 31A of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, and its provisos; (ii) whether the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

Analysis: The assessment year involved was 1977-78. The Tribunal proceeded on the footing that the second proviso to section 31A of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, came into force only on 03.09.1977, whereas the proviso was in substance already part of the provision and had merely been rearranged by amendment. Because the Tribunal examined the claim on a mistaken view of the governing provision, its conclusion on deductibility could not be sustained. The Court did not finally pronounce on the rival submissions regarding the interaction between section 36(1)(ii) and section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or on the allowability of the claim on merits.

Conclusion: The Tribunal's order could not stand as rendered on an incorrect legal basis, and the appeal had to be reheard on all contentions open to both sides.

Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by remitting the matter to the Tribunal for fresh adjudication without a final determination on the deductibility of the bonus claim.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the appellate fact-finding authority has proceeded on a patent mistake as to the applicable statutory provision, the matter may be remitted for reconsideration on the correct legal basis, leaving the substantive issue open.

---