Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the job worker was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 83/94-C.E. dated 11-4-1994 and, consequently, to waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty during the pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The notification required the supplier of raw material to file the undertaking that the goods manufactured on job work basis would be used in the supplier's factory in or in relation to the manufacture of specified goods. On the facts noted, the applicant was only a job worker and had cleared the goods on labour charges. The notification did not cast an obligation on the job worker to file any undertaking or declaration. Accordingly, the appellant had established a strong prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The benefit of the notification could not be denied to the job worker at the interim stage, and waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was granted with stay of recovery.