TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal affirms 'Coil Transfer Car' classification under Central Excise Tariff Act</h1> <h3>BHILAI ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS.</h3> BHILAI ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS. - 2012 (281) E.L.T. 514 (Chhattisgarh) Issues:Classification of 'Coil Transfer Car' under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.Analysis:1. The appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arose from a Final Order passed by the CESTAT, where the appeal filed by the respondent/Revenue was allowed.2. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing excisable goods, including a 'Coil Transfer Car,' claimed classification under Chapter sub-heading No. 8455.00 under heading No. 84.55 of the Central Excise Tariff.3. The Assistant Commissioner directed the appellant to show cause for classification under sub-heading No. 8606.00, heading No. 86.06, and confirmed the demand of Rs. 1,78,096/-, which the Commissioner (Appeals) later set aside.4. The CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Revenue, classifying the 'Car' under heading No. 86.06, considering it not an integral part of the rolling mill equipment.5. The Tribunal upheld the classification under heading 86.06, stating that the 'Car' is used for transporting coils within a short distance and does not modify the metal's structure or quality like rolling mills do.Legal Principles:1. The judgment referred to principles from previous cases, emphasizing classification based on popular or commercial understanding rather than technical definitions.2. It was noted that goods under a general heading for Excise Duty must be taxed accordingly, as per the Indian Tool Manufacturers case.3. The judgment highlighted that once an article is classified under a specific entry, the basis of classification is not open to question, as per the Dunlop India Ltd. case.Conclusion:1. The Tribunal's classification of the 'Coil Transfer Car' under heading 86.06 was upheld based on commercial understanding and the nature of its use as a transporter within a limited distance.2. The judgment dismissed the appeal, affirming the classification under heading 86.06, and no costs were awarded.
TaxTMI 