Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in a dispute concerning removal of waste and scrap to a job worker under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and whether the matter was revenue neutral.
Analysis: The issue involved interpretation of Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 in the context of scrap and waste sent to a job worker for reprocessing and return. It was noted that the appellant contended that the activity was covered by the earlier tribunal view and that, in any event, the exercise was revenue neutral because credit would be available at the job-worker stage and again on the returned brass wire. On that basis, the question required serious consideration and the appellant was found to have shown a prima facie case.
Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.