Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit was required to be reversed on removal of used capital goods when the credit, after applying the prescribed reduction, stood exhausted.
Analysis: The capital goods had been purchased and used for many years before removal. Under the second proviso to Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, where capital goods are removed after being used, the amount payable is the credit taken reduced by 2.5% for each quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of taking credit. On the facts found, the credit stood fully exhausted by the time the goods were cleared, and the fact that they were removed as old and used capital goods supported that position. The contrary view that the reduction could be applied only from the date of insertion of the proviso was rejected.
Conclusion: No reversal of cenvat credit was payable on removal of the capital goods, and the demand, interest, and penalty could not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: When used capital goods are removed, the payable amount is determined by the reduced credit formula under the second proviso to Rule 3(5), and if the credit is fully exhausted by use, no amount is payable on clearance.