TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellant disputes wealth tax calculation, challenges deductions, and cites ITAT precedents.</h1> <h3>Rajal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Wealth Tax Officer Ward-5(3) Ahmedabad</h3> Rajal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Wealth Tax Officer Ward-5(3) Ahmedabad - TMI Issues:Challenge to order of Commissioner of Wealth TaxConsideration of encumbrance on property for determining total wealthNon-consideration of explanations, submissions, and evidences by lower authoritiesApplication of Schedule-III of WT Act for valuation of jewelleryRelevance of right of user charges in determining wealthImpact of past history on appellate authority's decisionApplicability of previous Tribunal decision in appellant's caseIncorporation name change certificate's relevanceAnalysis:The appellant challenged the order of the Commissioner of Wealth Tax, contending that the total wealth was erroneously determined without considering the encumbrance on the property in the form of the right of use of Rajal. The appellant argued that the lower authorities failed to consider various explanations, submissions, and evidences, breaching the Principles of Natural Justice. The Wealth Tax Officer reduced the wealth of the assessee by the 'right of user charges' of Rs.6,74,677, leading to a declared wealth of Rs.26,52,136. The AO determined the value of jewellery based on Schedule-III of the WT Act, ignoring restrictive covenants as per Rule 18 and Circular No.281. The AO added the 'Right of user of Rajal' amount back to the wealth, citing a previous ITAT order in the appellant's case.The first appellate authority upheld the AO's decision based on past history. The appellant presented an ITAT decision in a related case, emphasizing the application of the judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. The appeals were dismissed with the direction that the High Court's decision would apply for the years in question. The appellant also submitted a certificate of incorporation reflecting a name change from Rajal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. to Arohi Consultants Pvt. Ltd.In conclusion, the appeals were dismissed, and the decision of the Hon'ble High Court was to be applied for the relevant years. The incorporation name change certificate was noted for record purposes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
