Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings for penalty for delayed filing of a wealth-tax return, the burden of showing reasonable cause for the delay lies on the assessee or on the Revenue.
Analysis: The statutory language under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 makes penalty contingent on failure to furnish the return without reasonable cause. The provision was treated as analogous to section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since reasonable cause is a matter within the special knowledge of the assessee, the initial onus to establish such cause lies on the assessee. The Revenue is not required to first prove absence of reasonable cause before penalty can be imposed.
Conclusion: The burden of proving reasonable cause for late filing lies on the assessee, not on the Revenue. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.