Rule 5 CENVAT refund limitation: Section 11B held inapplicable to accumulated export credit claims, with remand on merits.

Refund of accumulated CENVAT credit attributable to exports under Rule 5 was treated as distinct from refund of duty paid in cash, so Section 11B limitation was held inapplicable. The quarterly filing requirement in Notification No. 5/2006 was regarded as an administrative stipulation and not a time bar. Because the lower authorities rejected the claim only on limitation without examining whether the amount represented export-related accumulated credit, the rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit claimed under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis: The refund claim was for accumulated CENVAT credit attributable to exports and was not a claim for refund of duty already paid in cash. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that Section 11B governs refund of duty paid and does not apply to refund of unutilised CENVAT credit claimed under Rule 5. The quarterly filing stipulation in Notification No. 5/2006 was treated as an administrative requirement and not as a time limit barring the claim. The lower authorities had rejected the claim only on limitation, without examining whether the amount claimed correctly represented export-related accumulated credit.

Conclusion: The limitation under Section 11B was held not applicable to the Rule 5 refund claim. The rejection on time-bar was unsustainable, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration of the claim on merits.

---