Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refusal/waste arising during processing and manufacture of cigarettes could be treated as excisable goods or as inputs/final products attracting the exclusion in Notification No. 52/2002-C.E., and whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted.
Analysis: The exemption notification covered goods under Tariff Item 1206 90 20 and Chapter 24 used within the factory in or in relation to manufacture of final products under Chapter 24, but excluded inputs used for final products exempted from duty or chargeable to nil rate. On the facts placed before the Tribunal, the waste/refuse emerging during processing was viewed, prima facie, as not arising from manufacture and not constituting excisable goods. If the refuse itself was not excisable, the question of treating it as an exempted product or as one chargeable to nil duty did not arise, and the exclusion in the notification was prima facie inapplicable.
Conclusion: The appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery; relief was granted in favour of the assessee.