Import restriction on old photocopier parts upheld, but redemption fine and penalty reduced for proportionality.

Old and used parts of photocopiers were held to remain subject to the import restriction on second-hand goods under the Import Policy, because goods described as parts do not escape the prohibition merely by that description. Confiscation under customs law was therefore upheld. On penalty, repeated imports justified a deterrent response, but the redemption fine and penalty were found excessive in light of the assessable value and circumstances, so the monetary sanctions were reduced. The importer obtained only partial relief, with confiscation sustained but financial consequences moderated.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the import of old and used parts of photocopiers was prohibited or restricted so as to warrant confiscation under the Customs law; (ii) whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the importer required reduction.

Issue (i): whether the import of old and used parts of photocopiers was prohibited or restricted so as to warrant confiscation under the Customs law.

Analysis: The imported goods were old and used parts of photocopiers. The restriction on import flowed from para 2.17 of the Import Policy, which bars import of second-hand goods except second-hand capital goods unless covered by a licence. The goods could not be treated more favourably merely because they were described as parts; if second-hand complete photocopiers were restricted, old and used parts were also not free from restriction. The challenge to confiscation therefore failed.

Conclusion: The confiscation was upheld and was against the assessee.

Issue (ii): whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the importer required reduction.

Analysis: The repeated nature of the imports was relevant, and some deterrent fine and penalty were justified. At the same time, the amounts imposed were found to be excessive when compared with the approved assessable value and the circumstances of the case. The Court therefore interfered only to the extent of scaling down the monetary consequences.

Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty were reduced in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The import remained liable to confiscation, but the monetary consequences were moderated, resulting in only partial relief to the importer.

Ratio Decidendi: Old and used goods falling within a restrictive import policy are liable to confiscation, and while repeated infringement may justify deterrent fine and penalty, such monetary sanctions must remain proportionate to the value and circumstances of the import.

---