Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the original manufacturer was entitled to duty drawback in respect of the exported cars after abandoning rights and interest in the goods in favour of the insurer and where the exporter's disclaimer in favour of the manufacturer was disputed.
Analysis: The applicant had admittedly abandoned all rights and interests in the goods and received full and final insurance settlement. On that footing, the beneficial interest in the goods had passed to the insurer, who exported the goods through the merchant exporter. The claimed drawback could not be treated as an absolute entitlement merely because a brand rate had earlier been fixed, since drawback is a statutory incentive subject to the conditions of the drawback scheme. The disputed disclaimer issued by the merchant exporter could not override the abandonment or resolve the entitlement dispute in favour of the manufacturer. The matter was not one of mere fixation of rate, but of who was legally entitled to receive the drawback on the facts of the transaction.
Conclusion: The manufacturer was not entitled to the drawback claim; the rejection of its claim and the sanction in favour of the exporter were upheld.
Final Conclusion: The revision application failed, and the order rejecting the manufacturer's claim for drawback was affirmed.