Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rescinding notification withdrawing the excise exemption took effect only when the Gazette copy was made available for sale to the public, and whether the assessees were therefore entitled to the earlier exemption for clearances made before that date.
Analysis: The exemption had originally been granted under rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and was later withdrawn by a notification dated 30.11.1982. The decisive question was not merely the date printed on the Gazette but the date on which the notification was made known to the public. A notification having civil consequences cannot be enforced against the public until it is effectively published and brought to public notice. On the materials, the Gazette containing the withdrawal notification was placed on sale only on 08.12.1982. Therefore, the withdrawal could not operate during the intervening period from 30.11.1982 to 07.12.1982.
Conclusion: The withdrawal notification became effective only from 08.12.1982, and the assessees were entitled to the benefit of the earlier exemption for the relevant clearances. The refund and connected reliefs were correctly granted.