Permanent establishment and profit attribution remanded for fresh factual examination after incomplete resolution of the record.

The Tribunal found that the factual controversy over whether the Indian entity merely facilitated communication or instead negotiated prices and secured orders had not been properly resolved. As the lower authorities relied mainly on the absence of supporting material, while the assessee said relevant documents had been furnished to the extent available and some records were not traceable, the matter required a fresh factual examination. The Tribunal therefore remitted the issues of permanent establishment, attribution of profits, and levy of interest to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration after giving the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.

---

---

Issues: Whether the matter should be remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication on the questions of permanent establishment, attribution of profits, and levy of interest.

Analysis: The record showed conflicting positions on whether the Indian entity merely facilitated communication or actually negotiated prices and secured orders. The lower authorities proceeded largely on the absence of supporting material, while the assessee asserted that relevant documents had been furnished to the extent available and that some records were not traceable. The Tribunal found that the factual controversy had not been properly resolved and that the ends of justice would be served by a fresh examination of all issues after giving the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.

Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration.

---