TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules on independent deductions under Sections 80IB and 80HHC</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-tax, Shimla Versus M/s Emmbros Metal Pvt. Ltd.,</h3> Commissioner of Income-tax, Shimla Versus M/s Emmbros Metal Pvt. Ltd., - TMI Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to deductions under Sections 80IB and 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Interpretation of Section 80IA(9) in relation to other provisions in Chapter VIA.3. Restriction on aggregate deductions under Chapter VI-A.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to deductions under Sections 80IB and 80HHC:The core issue is whether an assessee can claim full deductions under both Sections 80IB and 80HHC independently or if the deductions must be proportionately reduced. The revenue argued that the deductions should be computed on the balance income after accounting for the initial deduction, while the assessee claimed that both deductions are independent and should be fully granted.2. Interpretation of Section 80IA(9):Section 80IA(9) states that profits and gains claimed under this section should not be allowed under any other provisions of Chapter VIA, and the total deductions should not exceed the profits of the eligible business. The revenue relied on the Delhi High Court's judgment in Great Eastern Exports, which interpreted the section to mean that once a deduction is allowed under Section 80IA, it should be reduced from the profits for any other deductions under Chapter VIA. The Bombay High Court, however, held that Section 80IA(9) restricts the allowance of deductions but not their computation.3. Restriction on aggregate deductions under Chapter VI-A:The Bombay High Court clarified that Section 80IA(9) affects the allowability of deductions to ensure that the total deductions do not exceed the profits of the business, but it does not disturb the computation of deductions under other sections. This view was supported by the Karnataka High Court, which stated that Sections 80HHC and 80IA are independent, and deductions should be computed separately.Judgment Summary:The High Court of Himachal Pradesh agreed with the Bombay High Court's interpretation, stating that the deductions under Sections 80IB and 80HHC are independent and should be computed separately. The court emphasized that Section 80IA(9) aims to prevent double benefits but does not affect the computation of deductions under other sections. The total deductions should not exceed the profits of the business, but each section's deductions should be allowed in full. The court concluded that the revenue's interpretation would make Section 80IA(9) unworkable and contrary to the statutory provisions.Conclusion:The court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing full deductions under both Sections 80IB and 80HHC, provided the total deductions do not exceed the profits of the business. The appeals were rejected with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 