Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether refund of service tax paid on terminal handling charges was admissible in relation to exports; and (ii) whether the refund claim had to be examined under Notification No. 17/2009-ST instead of Notification No. 41/2007-ST for the purpose of limitation.
Issue (i): whether refund of service tax paid on terminal handling charges was admissible in relation to exports.
Analysis: The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision in the appellant's own case, where it had been held that service tax paid on terminal handling charges in export transactions was refundable. That view was applied to the present claim as well.
Conclusion: Refund of service tax paid on terminal handling charges was held to be admissible.
Issue (ii): whether the refund claim had to be examined under Notification No. 17/2009-ST instead of Notification No. 41/2007-ST for the purpose of limitation.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted the departmental trade notice stating that claims filed after 07.07.2009 were to be considered under Notification No. 17/2009-ST and that the new notification did not exclude exports made before its issuance. On that basis, the objection based on six months under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was not accepted.
Conclusion: The refund claim was required to be considered under Notification No. 17/2009-ST, and the limitation objection failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the refund claim was sent back for fresh adjudication in accordance with the Tribunal's earlier view and the applicable notification framework.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the department itself treats post-07.07.2009 claims as falling under Notification No. 17/2009-ST, the refund claim cannot be rejected on the narrower footing of Notification No. 41/2007-ST, and refund of service tax on terminal handling charges for exports is admissible.