Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fire bricks grog, obtained by breaking and grinding refractory bricks into specified sizes and sold in loose condition, was classifiable as refractory bricks under Heading 6901.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and therefore excisable.
Analysis: The goods in dispute had been described by the Department as broken refractory bricks falling under Heading 6901.00, while the assessee had treated them as non-excisable. The record showed that the material was sold in gunny bags in loose condition. The appellate authority had found that, after grinding and breaking, the material could not retain the requisite shape contemplated by Chapter Note 2 of Chapter 69 and therefore fell outside the scope of that Chapter. The Tribunal found no infirmity in that reasoning and also noted that the adjudication had travelled beyond the scope of the show-cause notice.
Conclusion: Fire bricks grog was not classifiable under Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and was not excisable; the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the disputed material, after breaking and grinding, no longer satisfies the statutory shape requirement under the relevant chapter note, it cannot be classified under that chapter for excise duty.