High Court Upholds Power to Direct Record Reconstitution under RTI Act

The High Court upheld the authorities' power to direct the reconstitution of records under the Right To Information Act to provide information to the applicant. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining records and ensuring cooperation between the parties involved in the reconstitution process. The judgment highlighted the duty of the appellant to take prompt action in reconstituting records and upheld the dismissal of the appellant's writ petition by the learned Single Judge.

---

---

Issues:
1. Legality of directing re-constitution of records under the Right To Information Act.

Analysis:
The appellant raised a grievance regarding the authorities' direction to re-constitute records in a Right To Information Act proceeding before the High Court. The appellant argued that the authorities should not have directed the re-constitution of records before providing information to the applicant. The court noted that the appellant had initially sought information under the Act, and it was later ordered that the record, which was allegedly not traceable, be reconstituted before providing the information. The court emphasized that if the department is required to maintain the record and not discard relevant information, the authorities can direct the reconstitution of records to provide information to the applicant. The court highlighted that the appellant should have taken immediate steps to reconstitute the record upon realizing its unavailability, even seeking assistance from the applicant or obtaining necessary documents related to the original record.

The court further explained that the direction to reconstitute records is a crucial step in the process of furnishing information under the Right To Information Act. Therefore, the learned Single Judge's decision to dismiss the writ petition filed by the appellant was deemed appropriate by the High Court. The High Court found no legal flaw in the Single Judge's order and consequently dismissed the appeal. The High Court also emphasized that the respondent should cooperate with the department in the reconstitution process, which might require additional time, but it should be reasonable.

In conclusion, the High Court upheld the authorities' power to direct the reconstitution of records under the Right To Information Act to provide information to the applicant. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining records and ensuring cooperation between the parties involved in the reconstitution process. The judgment highlighted the duty of the appellant to take prompt action in reconstituting records and upheld the dismissal of the appellant's writ petition by the learned Single Judge.

---