Excise duty rate controversy placed the dispute within Supreme Court jurisdiction, excluding High Court review.

Interpretation of Notification No. 43/2001 and Notification No. 22/2003 was central to the dispute, but the controversy also involved a question relating to the rate of duty of excise. On that basis, the matter fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and the High Court's jurisdiction was excluded. The appeal was therefore not maintainable before the High Court and was liable to be rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal in view of the controversy relating to notifications and the determination of a question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise.

Analysis: The appeal turned on the interpretation of Notification No. 43/2001 dated 26-6-2002 and Notification No. 22/2003 dated 31-3-2003. Since the dispute involved, among other things, determination of a question relating to the rate of duty of excise, the matter fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. In such circumstances, the High Court's jurisdiction was excluded.

Conclusion: The High Court had no jurisdiction to decide the appeal and the appeal was liable to be rejected.

---