Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration after the appellant asserted reversal of the Cenvat credit taken on common input services.
Analysis: The appellant placed reliance on reversal of the entire Cenvat credit on input services and contended that such reversal should be treated as non-availment of credit for the purpose of the exemption notification. As this factual plea had not been examined by the lower authorities, the matter required reconsideration at the original adjudicatory stage. The Tribunal therefore declined to express any opinion on the merits and considered it appropriate to have the issue examined afresh after giving the parties an opportunity in accordance with natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision.