Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the service tax demand under the GTA exemption notification could be sustained when the assessee had furnished declarations of non-availment of CENVAT credit, though not on each consignment note, and whether denial of the benefit was justified on that ground.
Analysis: The demand had been confirmed solely because individual declarations were not recorded on every consignment note, with reliance placed on the departmental circular. The Tribunal noted that declarations from the road lines had been produced before the lower authorities and that the same circular had already been considered in a similar matter. It further noted that co-ordinate Benches had consistently held that where the GTA had filed a declaration on its letterhead regarding non-availment of CENVAT credit, the benefit of the exemption notification should not be denied. Since the declaration had in fact been filed in the present case, the objection was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The denial of the exemption was unjustified and the demand could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the assessee's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the substantive declaration regarding non-availment of CENVAT credit has been furnished, the exemption cannot be denied merely because the declaration is not repeated on each consignment note.