Taxability under the Income-tax Act must be decided first before treaty classification of software remittances as royalty or technical fees.

Treaty classification of remittances as royalty or fees for technical services could not be finally decided because no clear finding had been recorded on chargeability under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that taxability under the Act is a threshold question and must be determined first; only then can the India-Singapore DTAA be applied to characterise the payments. The matter was therefore remanded to the appellate authority to first decide whether the software-related remittances were taxable under the Act and, if necessary, then examine the treaty issue. The substantive question was left open for fresh adjudication.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in the absence of a finding on taxability under section 9 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the dispute regarding characterization of remittances as royalty or fees for technical services under the India-Singapore DTAA could be finally decided, or whether the matter had to be restored for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The assessee had remitted amounts towards software purchase, modification, implementation and annual maintenance without deduction of tax at source. The Assessing Officer treated the payments as taxable royalty and fees for technical services, while the appellate authority had addressed the DTAA characterisation but had not recorded a clear finding on chargeability under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Since liability to tax under the Act is a threshold issue, the treaty provisions could be considered only after determining whether the amount was chargeable under the Act. In the absence of such a finding, the Tribunal held that the appeal could not be finally decided on merits.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the appellate authority to first decide the taxability of the payments under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and thereafter, if necessary, to examine the DTAA issue. The assessee succeeded only to that extent.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with the substantive tax issue left open for fresh adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Treaty classification cannot be finally applied unless the chargeability of the payment under the Income-tax Act, 1961 is first determined.

---