1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court affirms Tribunal's decision in revenue appeal cases, no costs awarded</h1> The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal in dismissing the revenue's appeal in ... Manufacture - Classification - 'Iron Ore' or 'Iron Ore Concentrate' - tribunal observed that: the process undertaken by the respondents remove extraneous, unwanted material from the ore and as such is devoid of 'gangue' which adheres to the blasted ores. - The use of iron ore as mined or iron ore after the process undertaken by the respondents remains same that is to be used in metallurgical industry for the extraction of metals. - tribunal hold that the processes undertaken by the Respondents do not result in the manufacture of a different commercial commodity, not liable to duty of excise duty. Apex Court confirmed the order of CESTAT. The Supreme Court upheld the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision to dismiss the revenue's appeal in C.A.Nos.6389-6390/2003 & 3697/2006. The Court confirmed the Tribunal's orders, stating that they were justified based on the specific activity of the assessee. The appeals filed by the Revenue were rejected, and no costs were awarded.