TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds ITAT Decision on Royalty Payments</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 Versus CA Computer Associates India Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10 Versus CA Computer Associates India Pvt. Ltd. - [2013] 351 ITR 69 Issues:1. Appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against ITAT order.2. Substantial question of law regarding disallowance of royalty paid for distribution of software products.3. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for royalty paid to CA Management Inc. USA.4. Rejection of appeal by CIT (A) and observations by TPO and CIT (A).5. Interpretation of Section 92C for determining ALP in international transactions.6. Distinction between transactions with principal and clients regarding payment obligations.Analysis:1. The case involves an appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act against the ITAT order allowing the respondent's appeal against the CIT (A) order.2. The substantial question of law in focus is whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the disallowance made of royalty paid by the assessee to CA Management Inc. USA for distributing software products in India, especially considering the payment of royalty on bad debts where the software did not work.3. The dispute revolves around the determination of the Arm's Length Price (ALP) for the royalty paid by the respondent to CA Management Inc. USA. The respondent claimed the ALP at the contractual value, while the AO computed it at a lower value, resulting in a reduction of the loss declared by the respondent.4. The appeal made by the respondent was rejected by the CIT (A), and both the TPO and CIT (A) made observations regarding the payment of royalty on bad debts and the quality of products, leading to the disallowance.5. The interpretation of Section 92C of the Income Tax Act is crucial in this case, as it provides the basis for determining the ALP in international transactions. The section does not consider the failure of customers to pay as a relevant factor in determining the ALP, emphasizing the distinction between transactions with the principal and clients.6. The judgment highlights the distinction between transactions with the principal, CA Management Inc. USA, and the clients purchasing products from the respondent. The court emphasizes that the ALP of the royalty should not be reduced due to the respondent's clients failing to pay, as these are separate transactions, and the vendor is not concerned with the recovery of prices from the clients.In conclusion, the High Court upheld the ITAT's decision, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee, dismissing the appeal and emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between transactions with the principal and clients in determining the Arm's Length Price for royalty payments in international transactions.
TaxTMI 