Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, deletes penalties under Sec 271(1)(c) for assessment years 2001-02 & 02-03</h1> <h3>Suman Raheja, Versus DCIT</h3> Suman Raheja, Versus DCIT - TMI Issues:Challenge against penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961 for assessment years 2001-02 & 02-03.Analysis:The appeals were directed against penalties confirmed by CIT(A) for the mentioned assessment years. The assessee argued that penalties on additional income disclosed in response to notice u/s 153A were wrongly imposed. The assessee cited a similar case where penalties were deleted by the ITAT, Delhi, and requested for the penalties to be deleted in this case as well due to identical facts and issues.The Revenue, supported by decisions from various High Courts, sought confirmation of the penalties. It was clarified that in the cited cases, revised returns were filed, and no additional income was disclosed in response to notice u/s 153A. However, the authorities relied on upheld the penalties.Upon review, it was found that additional income was disclosed in returns filed in response to notice u/s 153A for both assessment years. Reference was made to a precedent where the High Court clarified that penalties under section 271(1)(c) are not applicable if there is no concealment or inaccurate particulars in the return filed u/s 153A. The amended provisions of Explanation 5 and 5A were discussed, emphasizing their applicability based on the date of search initiation.The Tribunal concluded that penalties were not justified based on the facts and circumstances of the case, following the earlier decision. Since no contrary material was presented, and the issue was covered, the penalties were directed to be deleted for both assessment years. The appeals of the assessee were accepted accordingly.