TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether futures and forward contracts in electricity fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Forward Markets Commission under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 or within the jurisdiction of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission under the Electricity Act, 2003; (ii) Whether the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission could validly regulate futures and forward contracts in electricity by the impugned orders and the 2010 Power Market Regulations.
Issue (i): Whether futures and forward contracts in electricity fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Forward Markets Commission under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 or within the jurisdiction of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission under the Electricity Act, 2003.
Analysis: The two enactments operate in distinct but overlapping fields. The Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 governs forward contracts and futures markets in notified goods through the statutory framework of recognition, regulation, and supervision by the Forward Markets Commission. The Electricity Act, 2003 is a comprehensive enactment governing generation, transmission, distribution, trading, and development of the power market. Although the Electricity Act empowers the appropriate commission to promote development of a market in power, including trading, the statute does not confer exclusive authority on the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission to regulate futures and forward contracts as such. Conversely, the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act does not permit either authority to act as though it had sole control over electricity futures. The proper approach is harmonious reading of both statutes, because neither can be read as wholly displacing the other in this area.
Conclusion: Neither authority has exclusive jurisdiction over futures and forward contracts in electricity. The field is not wholly occupied by either statute.
Issue (ii): Whether the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission could validly regulate futures and forward contracts in electricity by the impugned orders and the 2010 Power Market Regulations.
Analysis: The impugned orders and regulations, insofar as they purported to bring futures and forward contracts in electricity within the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's operative control, travelled beyond the present statutory framework. The power under the Electricity Act to promote development of a market in power and frame regulations could support regulation of the physical electricity market and associated trading structures, but not the assumption of exclusive control over futures and forward contracts in electricity in the face of the specific regime under the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952. Since the Parliament had not enacted a specific regime authorising such futures trading in electricity under one authority alone, the impugned regulatory provisions could not be given effect to for that purpose.
Conclusion: The impugned orders and the 2010 Regulations were inoperative and unsustainable to the extent they dealt with futures and forward contracts in electricity.
Final Conclusion: The petitions succeeded in part: the regulatory measures could not operate for electricity futures and forward contracts, while the broader statutory domains of both enactments were left otherwise undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where two special Central enactments govern adjacent fields, one dealing with futures markets and forward contracts in notified goods and the other with the development of the electricity market, neither statute can be construed to confer exclusive authority over electricity futures in the absence of a specific legislative mandate; regulatory action must remain within the parent statute and cannot override the specific regime governing forward contracts.
TaxTMI 
